The Qiman - A Framework for Timing, Refined Across Four Generations
Methodology
① Reviewed, Not Automated
Every case file is read and finalised by a practitioner before it reaches you — never generated or sent without human review.
② A Four-Generation Lineage
The framework used originates from a family practice refined since the early 20th century. Read our story
③ Written, Not Improvised
You receive a structured document, not a live call or chat transcript — built to be reread and referenced.
Every decision has a shape. Choose the format that matches yours.
Ask well, and the answer needs no defending.
SAMPLE WRITTEN REPLY
ery case delivered as a case file, not a chat log.
A structured written brief, reviewed and finalised before it reaches your inbox.
Your Questions, Answered
-
The Qiman is a private decision-timing advisory. A client submits one consequential decision in writing — a hire, a fundraise, a signing, a launch — and receives a written Case File examining what the timing supports, what it resists, and what changes if they wait. Everything is delivered in writing. There are no calls, no meetings, and no video sessions.
-
Qi Men Dun Jia is one of the three classical Chinese decision systems, historically reserved for questions of state and military strategy. Rather than reading a person's birth chart, it reads a specific moment — the conditions surrounding a decision at the time it is asked. The method practiced at The Qiman has been held in one family for four generations.
-
No. Fortune telling claims to reveal a fixed future. A Case File does the opposite: it examines the structure of a specific moment and presents what it supports and what it resists — evidence to be cross-examined, not a verdict to be obeyed. If you are looking for predictions, lucky dates, or guaranteed outcomes, this is not the right service.description
-
Three reasons. A written analysis can be checked, questioned, and kept — a phone call cannot. Writing forces precision on our side: every claim in a Case File has to survive being read twice. And writing protects your discretion: nothing requires your voice, your face, or your calendar.
-
A written Case File. It states the question examined, what the timing of the moment supports, what it resists, what changes if you wait, and what we deliberately did not conclude. It is designed to sit alongside the advice of your lawyer, your accountant, and your coach — not to replace any of them.
-
Questions where timing is the real variable: whether to sign now or after the quarter, whether to make the hire this month or next, whether to open the fundraise before or after a launch. One question per engagement. Specific questions produce useful files; vague ones do not.
-
We do not answer questions about health, medical matters, or life and death — ever, at any price. We do not give legal, financial, or investment advice. We do not predict outcomes, sell certainty, or tell you what to decide. And we do not take every case: if a question is outside what the method can examine responsibly, we decline it and say so.
-
The Qiman is operated privately by the holder of a four-generation family practice. We do not publish a personal name, a face, or a biography — discretion runs in both directions. What we publish instead is our method, our standards, and our reasoning, in the Journal, where every claim can be examined on its own merits.
-
Engagements start at $280 USD, with the full structure on the Services page. Pricing is published and fixed — we do not quote on request, and we do not adjust pricing based on who is asking.
-
A Case File is delivered in writing within 48 hours of an accepted engagement. We accept a limited number of cases each month; when the month is full, the inquiry page says so.
-
Then that is the file. A finding that the timing resists your move is not a non-answer — it is often the most valuable answer we deliver, and the file will show you what would have to change for the answer to become different.
-
You don't have to act on it. We report what the analysis shows, including when it says wait. The decision stays yours.
-
No. Every reading is prepared for the specific moment you ask, and work begins as soon as your question comes in. Once the written reply has been delivered, the work is done, and no refunds are issued. If your reply has not arrived within the stated timeframe, email ask@theqiman.com and we will sort it out.
Why do you ask for the time and location?
In Qi Men Dun Jia, the moment a question is asked carries its own structure. The time and place you ask determine the chart that is read — without them, the analysis has nothing to stand on. This is also why the method does not require your birth chart: it reads the moment of the decision, not the moment of your birth.
Can I ask follow-up questions?
One brief written clarification is welcome. A Case File reads the moment the question was asked — if your situation changes significantly, that is a new question and a new engagement.
What if the file does not address my question?
If a Case File does not directly and substantively address the question you submitted, we will revise it once at no additional charge, provided the request is made within 24 hours of delivery. This covers the relevance and completeness of the analysis — not the outcome of decisions you make after receiving it.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHOOSE YOUR FORMAT
Founding Cohort — Twelve Clients
The Qiman is accepting twelve founding clients. Each receives the same written Case File as any engagement, with one addition: a follow-up timing review ninety days after delivery, at no further charge. In return, each founding client is asked for a short written reflection on the work, which may be quoted anonymously.
When the twelve places are filled, the cohort closes.
The method reads any high-stakes decision — the deal, and the life around it. Relocation. Family. The move that does't appear in the boardroom. One boundary is permanent: we do not read health or medical decisions.
Selected Case Files. Details are anonymized for confidentiality. Outcomes are shown only where the client reported them back.
Case 02 — A startup weighing a Series A term sheet
The question: sign, negotiate, or walk.
The reading: the investor's leverage peaks mid-month. Wait.
The outcome: negotiated later. Valuation up 15%.
— Former Client, Standard Reading
Case 04 — A CEO planning a major product launch
The question: launch, hold, or pivot.
The reading: market attention is fragmented. Wait three weeks.
The outcome: delayed. The competitor launched first, and failed.
— Former Client, Standard Reading
Case 07 — A business owner facing an unsolicited buyout
The question: sell, hold, or counter.
The reading: the buyer's urgency is high. Demand a premium.
The outcome: countered. Sold at two and a half times the initial offer.
— Former Client, Standard Reading
Case 09 — A family office reviewing a property acquisition
The question: buy, pass, or renegotiate.
The reading: the cost of money is peaking. Renegotiate, or pass.
The outcome: passed. The market corrected within the year.
— Former Client, Standard Reading
Case 12 — A startup facing a PR crisis
The question: apologize, stay silent, or counter.
The reading: the news cycle is short. Wait forty-eight hours.
The outcome: stayed silent. The story died on its own.
— Former Client, Standard Reading
Case 15 — A CEO planning a restructuring
The question: cut deep, cut shallow, or delay.
The reading: cut once, and cut clean. Delay only worsens morale.
The outcome: one cut. The culture stabilized faster than expected.
— Former Client, Standard Reading
Further Case Files
Case 01 — A founder weighing a major acquisition
Proceed, delay, or walk away. Momentum stalls in Q3; the window is narrow. Delayed — terms improved in Q1.
Case 05 — A tech executive offered a lateral move
Accept, decline, or counter. The new role's foundation is weak. Declined — a better fit within sixty days.
Case 06 — A founder deciding on cross-border expansion
Enter, wait, or partner. Regulatory headwinds in the target market. Waited — the regulation shifted in their favor.
Case 10 — A founder mediating a partnership dissolution
Dissolve, restructure, or buy out. The partner is distracted; move quickly. Buyout — clean separation, no litigation.
Case 11 — A CTO deciding on a critical system migration
Migrate, patch, or rebuild. Instability peaks next month; patch now. Patched — a major outage avoided.
Case 13 — A founder evaluating a key executive hire
Hire, wait, or promote from within. The candidate's references are weak. Waited — a stronger candidate appeared.
Case 14 — An investor weighing a follow-on round
Invest, pass, or reduce. The founder's momentum is fading. Passed — the company missed its targets.
Case 16 — A founder deciding on a strategic partnership
Sign, walk, or pilot. The partner's incentives are misaligned. Piloted — the partnership quietly dissolved.
Case 18 — An executive negotiating a severance package
Accept, fight, or mediate. The company is eager to close; push for more. Mediated — the package increased 40%.
A reading maps the moment — it does not decide it. Judgment, as always, rests with you.